<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Art or Child Pornography?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://gothic-peach.net/blogging-2/art-or-child-pornography/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://gothic-peach.net/blogging-2/art-or-child-pornography/</link>
	<description>My So-Called Life</description>
	<pubDate>Tue, 06 Jan 2009 11:10:00 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.7</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Joana</title>
		<link>http://gothic-peach.net/blogging-2/art-or-child-pornography/comment-page-1/#comment-1822</link>
		<dc:creator>Joana</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 30 Sep 2007 00:25:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gothic-peach.net/2007/09/26/art-or-child-pornography/#comment-1822</guid>
		<description>You can see the photo on this &lt;a href="http://hitsusa.com/blog/140/klara-and-edda-belly-dancing/"&gt;blog post&lt;/a&gt; Charity. I think it's a controversial image that is open to interpretation. However, I think the real reason so much fuss is being kicked up now and not before when this image was displayed in New York, Dallas, Madrid, London, and so on is because the photo that was going to be displayed was from Sir Elton John's collection. [begin sarcasm]*gasp* An openly and well known gay celebrity has a photo feature child nudity? It must be child porn! [/end sarcasm]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You can see the photo on this <a target="_blank" href="http://hitsusa.com/blog/140/klara-and-edda-belly-dancing/">blog post</a> Charity. I think it&#8217;s a controversial image that is open to interpretation. However, I think the real reason so much fuss is being kicked up now and not before when this image was displayed in New York, Dallas, Madrid, London, and so on is because the photo that was going to be displayed was from Sir Elton John&#8217;s collection. [begin sarcasm]*gasp* An openly and well known gay celebrity has a photo feature child nudity? It must be child porn! [/end sarcasm]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Joana</title>
		<link>http://gothic-peach.net/blogging-2/art-or-child-pornography/comment-page-1/#comment-2929</link>
		<dc:creator>Joana</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 30 Sep 2007 00:25:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gothic-peach.net/2007/09/26/art-or-child-pornography/#comment-2929</guid>
		<description>You can see the photo on this &lt;a href="http://hitsusa.com/blog/140/klara-and-edda-belly-dancing/"&gt;blog post&lt;/a&gt; Charity. I think it&#39;s a controversial image that is open to interpretation. However, I think the real reason so much fuss is being kicked up now and not before when this image was displayed in New York, Dallas, Madrid, London, and so on is because the photo that was going to be displayed was from Sir Elton John&#39;s collection. [begin sarcasm]*gasp* An openly and well known gay celebrity has a photo feature child nudity? It must be child porn! [/end sarcasm]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You can see the photo on this <a target="_blank" href="http://hitsusa.com/blog/140/klara-and-edda-belly-dancing/">blog post</a> Charity. I think it&#39;s a controversial image that is open to interpretation. However, I think the real reason so much fuss is being kicked up now and not before when this image was displayed in New York, Dallas, Madrid, London, and so on is because the photo that was going to be displayed was from Sir Elton John&#39;s collection. [begin sarcasm]*gasp* An openly and well known gay celebrity has a photo feature child nudity? It must be child porn! [/end sarcasm]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
